I have spent the better part of my career litigating business disputes in the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Superior Court, and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Over the course of that work, one of the things I have come to appreciate most is the mediation process.
As a
In a noteworthy and recent Court of Chancery decision, Mehra v. Teller, C.A. No. 2019-0812-KSJM (Del. Ch. Jan. 29, 2021), the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled upon a member’s request to invalidate dissolution of a Delaware limited liability company. The opinion is an important read as the Court considered whether the LLC deadlock–which provided
The Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (“DRULPA”) sets forth the standard to dissolve a limited partnership formed under Delaware law. 6 Del. C. § 17-101, et seq.
Under Section 17-801 of the DRULPA, a Delaware limited partnership will voluntarily dissolve upon the occurrence of certain events, including: (i) at a time specified in
In a prior post, we discussed the standards required to obtain relief under Section 273 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), i.e. (i) that a Delaware corporation has two 50/50 stockholders, (ii) that the company is engaged in a joint venture, and (iii) the 50/50 stockholders are unable to agree as to whether
When a Delaware corporation is deadlocked and unable to operate as a result of dissension among its shareholders or directors, or has abandoned its business, what remedies are available to the company’s shareholders under Delaware law? Section 226 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) squarely addresses this issue. Under that statute, any shareholder of
Section 273 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) provides a basis for the dissolution of a deadlocked “joint venture” corporation, in which two equal shareholders cannot agree on whether to discontinue the corporation. However, the Delaware Limited Liability Act (“LLC Act”) does not have a provision similar to 8 Del. C. § 273