Photo of Carl D. Neff

Carl D. Neff is a Delaware licensed attorney with the law firm of Pierson Ferdinand LLP and is based in Delaware. Carl’s practice focuses in the areas of corporate and commercial litigation before the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Supreme Court, the Delaware Superior Court and the District of Delaware.

 

The recent amendments to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) are, in a word, significant. These amendments fundamentally shift how stockholders can access corporate books and records. The changes, which came through Senate Bill 21 enacted on March 25, 2025, attempt to strike a balance between stockholder rights and corporate efficiency—but

In a noteworthy decision from the Delaware Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Morgan T. Zurn dismissed a stockholder’s attempt to use an appraisal petition as an alternative method to obtain corporate books and records.

test

What struck me most about this opinion is the court’s thorough analysis of the statutory distinctions between Sections 220 and 262.

I just read an interesting Delaware Court of Chancery decision in Walker v. FRP Investors GP. This is a post-trial opinion from Vice Chancellor Zurn that offers some interesting insights into Delaware partnership agreements and valuation disputes.

test

The case involves Cornelius “Cory” Walker, who helped build an insurance brokerage company that entered a lucrative

I’ve been following this case closely, and I think the Court of Chancery’s ruling offers a perfect illustration of Delaware’s pragmatic approach to books and records disputes. In a recent decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed the standards for staying a books and records production order pending appeal. Vice Chancellor David’s opinion in Bruch

If there’s one thing I’ve learned from years of working with founders, it’s that protecting your position isn’t a one-and-done deal. The mechanisms that keep you safely in the driver’s seat during your seed round might be woefully inadequate by the time you’re raising a Series C. Let me walk you through how founder protection

In Star America Rail Holdco, LLC v. Casey Cathcart and Cathcart Rail Holdco, LLC, C.A. No. 2024-0883-LWW, the Delaware Court of Chancery considered whether unambiguous LLC agreement terms allowed an outside investor to remove a company’s CEO without the board’s consent. The Court decided that unambiguous terms of an agreement prevail, and the investor

In the Section 220 books and records inspection case of PVH Polymath Venture Holdings Ltd. v. TAG Fintech Inc., C.A. No. 2023-0502-BWD (Del. Ch. Jan. 26, 2024), PVH Polymath Venture Holdings Ltd. (“Polymath”) sought inspection of TAG Fintech, Inc.’s (“TAG”) records after discovering TAG had submitted a forged letter to Pakistani regulators. The

As we’ve discussed previously, it is imperative that a stockholder making a books and records demand under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) comply with all statutory requirements. The recent decision of Martin Floreani et al. v. FloSports, Inc., C.A. No. 2023-0684-LM (Del. Ch. Oct. 31, 2024) underscores this